Know Bible Facts From Fiction, Science and Prophecy for today!

By B. Walker

I often get questions and taunts from those who are not believers and this one below was somewhat of a nasty sort, but I gave reply anyway as there were several good points they raised that needed addressed and so my reply is below.

The Bible isn’t science tell me about the science of a virgin giving birth. Or the science behind someone dying, and three days later, wakin' up! Or the science behind snakes & donkeys that can talk. Oh, and don't forget to mention the science behind the invisible sky-man himself. Since you seem to be a fan of thermodynamics, you understand that something NEVER comes from nothing, right? So, who created God?

I know this is a taunt but I will reply anyway because you did ask some good questions that need to be replied to if not for you, maybe another.

YOU” look around at all that is created and see no purpose I look around and see direct cause and effect. You look to self to explain, I look to God to clarify answers. Why is it so hard to believe that with all the complexities in the design and life support system of this world, that the creation of our universe happened by the design of a great creator. This same great creator who caused all this to happen could in fact cause a woman of whom he created to become impregnated even though she was a virgin

You want us to believe that this world was created by nothing, for nothing, from nothing, for no reason; and this is the most logical and scientific answer and is a better answer then what I stated? HOW? Let’s take this one step further you reject anything that does not fit into your philosophy as to how the worlds were created because it does not fit the prevailing assumptions about prehistory.
From consciousness- based reality to theories about advanced lost civilizations that we have proof of, paradigms that force a reevaluation of our origins. You claim its all hogwash. All evidence to the contrary, you deem such theories to be fraud or flawed, violating the cardinal rule of Bacon’s method by priori assumptions, all the while claiming the highest standard of intellectual purity and yet these very persons violate this principal every time you produce a theory if it is not based on observable data and includes assumption..

You forget the basics of science to begin with and that is E=Mc2 or Energy = mass =speed of light so now I ask you tell me this will you? Where did all that Big Bang energy come from in the first place?” I say dark energy and dark matter, what say you? If you doubt that it exists tell NASA that and let us all know how that works out for you will you! You think your reasoning is more logical than mine? Explain it then.

Your next twist is to mock the resurrection of Christ and yet you mock the accomplishments man has made as well and for this you prove your mind is a closed system. We know that energy can not be created or destroyed it only changes shape, so what happens to the energy once the body is no longer animated? If you are a Christian you know, and if not you will. We know that the body and brain is made up of electrical impulses and that the muscles in the body react from these tiny signals sent from the brain and tell us to move ect. We further know that with all sorts of medical equipment we can measure these various impulses and turn the data into a chart to prove life exists.

We can even use Kirlian photography to see the measurements of the electrical flow of the energy inside the body flowing out. I find it ironic that the early painters painted the image of Christ with either a halo or shiny aura around him much the same way that Kirlian photography shows an aura of sorts. Also look to the heat seeking technologies that shows energy being expended. Or the MRI, EKG and the list goes on.

We can also hold our finger on our wrists and feel the pulse and the blood rushing through our veins all caused by that tiny electrical beat caused in the heart telling it to react, our body heats and cools depending upon how our thoughts are projected or the amount of work or exercise we are doing. Now onto the resurrection idea that you have shut out of your mind and that is this. We see resurrections every day and think nothing of this and it has become the norm in every day life. We can have a heart attack or drown and die and yet if we are lucky enough to get medical help in time, we see resurrection every day in the hospitals and by EMT’s and it is never questioned at all and we are mere mortal men why would it be so hard to believe that the creator of the world could do the same except on a more grandiose scale? Are we not said to be made in his image? Bodies are reanimated every day is this not scientific fact?

You as most take the story of the Serpent to the extreme and are in error as most. The word serpent in Hebrew is nachash, naw-khash it is a prime root meaning to his, whisper, enchant, cast a spell prognosticate, learn, divine learning, observe, or means to whisper as in the ear as to seduce or lie too as psssssssssssst come here I need to tell you something I don’t want others to know. Satan was an angelic being hell bent to deceive and beguile Eve both physically and mentally and that he did.

Now you say where is the science in this? Why is NASA spending billions of dollars searching for life’s origins in space? They are looking to find that missing link that is spoken of in ancient writings and pictures such as those from the Enki, Sumerians, Egyptians, The Dogon people ect.

Now the Ass" who spoke I believe that this is possible and true for various reasons if God could create the worlds he could make a dumb ass speak! And the scientific proof in this comes in the form of you!

Who created dark energy? Who created dark matter? Science only helps to explain how god created and not why god created. God already exists and science fails to explain that its study of the physical world is limited by the laws God set in order at the time of the creation this is like the argument of the chicken or the egg.

Who created the physical laws that bind us to this plane of existence? What is consciousness? Why do we have deja ju? What is precognition? I know not excepted by science right? Emotions are but chemical reactions to outside stimulus and all that stuff. I can and have used that logic against you people before so I will not entertain you as this was a taunt anyway thus my jab about the “Dumb ass”. For years people believed that there was no such thing as dark energy or neutrinos we now know and they have been proven to exist.

12/27/2010 01:58:50 pm

This is an interesting notion and probably at least partly true.

Himangsu Sekhar Pal
1/23/2011 10:09:03 am

Earlier it was impossible for us to give any satisfactory answer to this question. But modern science, rather we should say that Einstein, has made it an easy task for us. And Stephen Hawking has provided us with the clue necessary for solving this riddle. Actually scientists in their infinite wisdom have already kept the ground well-prepared for us believers so that one day we can give a most plausible and logically sound answer to this age-old question. Let us first see how Hawking has helped us by providing the necessary clue. In his book “A Brief History of Time” (Chapter: The origin and fate of the universe) he informs us that there are 1080 particles in the region of the observable universe. Then he raised the question regarding the origin of these particles, and gave the answer himself. According to quantum theory particles can be created out of energy in the form of particle/antiparticle pairs. But there the question does not stop. Another question pops up regarding the origin of that energy. But when it is said that total energy of the universe is exactly zero, then all is said and done. So this is the clue: if we can somehow arrive at zero, then no further question will be raised, and there will be no infinite regression. What I intend to do here is something similar to that. I want to show that our God is a bunch of several zeroes, and that therefore no further question need be raised about His origin. And here comes Einstein with his special theory of relativity for giving us the necessary empirical support to our project.
God is a Being. Therefore God will have existence as well as essence. So I will have to show that both from the point of view of existence as well as from the point of view of essence God is zero. It is almost a common saying that God is spaceless, timeless, changeless, immortal, and all-pervading. Here we are getting three zeroes; space is zero, time is zero, change is zero. But how to prove that if there is a God, then that God will be spaceless, timeless, and changeless? From special theory of relativity we come to know that for light both distance and time become unreal. For light even an infinite distance is infinitely contracted to zero. The volume of an infinite universe full of light only will be simply zero due to this property of light. A universe with zero volume is a spaceless universe. Again at the speed of light time totally stops. So a universe full of light only is a spaceless, timeless universe. But these are the properties of light only! How do we come to know that God is also having the same properties of light so that God can also be spaceless, timeless? Scientists have shown that if there is a God, then that God can only be light, and nothing else, and that therefore He will have all the properties of light. Here is the proof.
Scientists have shown that total energy of the universe is always zero. If total energy is zero, then total mass will also be zero due to energy-mass equivalence. Now if there is a God, then scientists have calculated the total energy and mass of the universe by taking that God into consideration. In other words, if there is a God, then this total energy-mass calculation by the scientists is God-inclusive, not God-exclusive. This is due to two reasons. First of all, even if there is a God, they are not aware of the fact that there is a God. Secondly, they do not believe that there is a God. So, if there is a God, then they have not been able to keep that God aside before making this calculation, because they do not know that there is a God. They cannot say that they have kept Him aside and then made this calculation, because by saying so they will admit that there is a God. They cannot say that the behind-the-picture God has always remained behind the picture, and that He has in no way come into the picture when they have made this calculation, because by saying so they will again admit that there is a God. At most they can say that there is no God. But we are not going to accept that statement as the final verdict on God-issue, because we are disputing that statement. So the matter of the fact is this: if God is really there, then total mass and total energy of the universe including that God are both zero. Therefore mass and energy of God will also be zero. God is without any mass, without any energy. And Einstein has already shown that anything having zero rest-mass will have the speed of light. In other words, it will be some sort of light. So, if God is there, then God will also be light, and therefore He will be spaceless, timeless. So from the point of view of existence God is zero, because he is spaceless, timeless, without any mass, without any energy.
Now we will have to show that from the point of view of essence also God is

1/29/2011 10:25:20 am

Nice angle and this took on some excellent thinking and deduction. The one thing that we don't quite understand is are the physical laws of light the same in heaven as on earth???????????????


Leave a Reply.